While Shure’s SM7B is the first-call mic for many sources, it is an entire rockstar conversation mic. You’ll come across this lively beauty hanging out of broadcast booms from voiceover, ADR, radio, and podcast studios across the world. Two settings allow you to tailor the SM7B into a vast range of applications and listeners.
Whether or not you would like to bring out the resonance of a heavy baritone, tame the brittleness of a large soprano, capture a whisper, or capture a gunshot, the Shure SM7B is a must-have portion of your rig. Keep reading Fidlar’s post to see complete details in our Shure Sm7B Reviews.
Table of Contents
Shure Sm7B Review
- Microphone Type: Dynamic
- Polar Pattern: Cardioid
- Frequency Response: 50Hz-20kHz
- Output Impedance: 150 ohms
- Low Cut Filter: Bass Roll off
- Color: Black
- Connector: XLR
- Weight: 1.69 lbs.
- Included Accessories: Windscreen
- Very natural sound
- Crystal clean, rich lows
- Exceptionally smooth highs
- Low cut and high boost filters
- Ease of use
- Works without external shock mount and pop filters
- Good sound isolation, not as hot as condensers
- Cheaper than high-end condenser mics
- Requires a decent mixer or preamp
Where to buy microphones:
Shure SM7b microphone comes with an internal shock mount that provides more than sufficient absorption and replacements for all those bulky external shock mounts that you will often find around Neumann’s.
Therefore, even though the microphone initially appears enormous, it’s, in fact, much smaller compared to a Neumann + shock bracket combo.
Moreover, there’s also an incorporated pop filter, and in conjunction with the mic’s foam cover eliminates the need for outside pop filters. Just imagine today the Neumann + shock bracket + enormous pop filter in addition to that.
This will completely block your vision and make it impossible to watch contact between the host and the guest, besides different constraints.
There’s a circumstance if you wish to take out the foam altogether and use a traditional pop filter. After recording the vocals in the studio, then this is precisely what you will do.
The main reason is, foams muffle the high frequencies, so the microphone will not seem as bright as you would want to at the mixture.
This is particularly significant with SM7B since it soothes and calms the highs and, consequently, does not seem as bright as condensers.
But it has a great feature known as presence increase that compensates for its lack of brightness and has you better results in the long run. Low trimming can also be there, and it has a nice easy transition, but I did not find myself using it up to a large increase.
Sound & Quality
Shure SM7B has quite a wealthy yet impartial and natural-looking low-end. In this regard, it’s similar to some excellent bass mic. You won’t notice any distortion or boominess of a regular consumer-grade microphone; it’s merely clean, balanced, and deep bass.
And this is only one reason why folks fall in love with this mike. No more do you need to seek to get a compromise involving looking boomy and lean by clipping that generally distorted low end completely.
You will probably find the advantages even if you don’t possess a low-pitched voice, but if you do, then you will not ever exchange it for anything else!
At precisely the same time, it does not sacrifice the quality of its frequency range. The midrange is equally impartial, with little coloration, but the large end is a stone.
Even though there’s a visible dip onto the frequency diagram, the highs are still extraordinarily smooth and incredibly transparent. It will have to do with the microphone using a dynamic capsule, but also, it has to do with the quality of the mic.
In my ears, it seems better than any flatter condenser because the pricey condensers tend to possess a certain quantity of edginess, graininess, or harshness; however, the SM7B is entirely smooth.
There are the drawbacks of this being lively. It is not quite as eloquent as condensers, and it does not supply the elongated answer around 20 kHz, but these are not cons much more like common attributes of any lively.
But its more or less level reply, all of the way around 12 kHz, ought to be more than adequate for almost any vocal applications. It’s more to do with the high end’s caliber as opposed to just how high it could go.
And needless to say, the transient response is nowhere close to condensers. Therefore it will not have the ability to catch as much of this detail, but it is still fairly decent for a lively.
But, for software besides studio microphone recording, condensers tend to be overly hot and catch everything. This is particularly true for radio channels since you don’t wish to record every part of your guest.
And, of course, the background sound, air-conditioning, and potential room reflections are inevitable away from the studio walls. However, this isn’t the only reason Shure SM7B is indeed standard.
Contrary to studio-grade condensers, this microphone can be much easier to use. For that reason, it warrants to get a more consistent production and leaves fewer opportunities for you or your furry friend to jumble up.
Shure SM7B vs. Rode NT-1
The Rode NT-1 is a condenser mic instead of the Shure SM7B’s lively recording mechanism. This usually means that the Rode requires phantom power, so while it appears more affordable at face-value, you are investing in additional hardware to ensure it is usable.
This may create the Shure SM7B mic more attractive for users that desire their installation to be as easy as possible, with few factors.
Although the two mics are hardy, lively microphones have a more straightforward mechanism to build, making them more resilient than their condenser counterparts.
This is not a massive deal for consumers working in a studio, but if you transfer your equipment around a great deal or were considering using it as an on-stage alternative, the Shure sm7b cardioid dynamic microphone can, again, be the thing to do.
Shure SM7B vs. Shure 55SH Series II
Shure and Shure go head-to-head here, and the SM7B and 55SH Series II are tasteful blades that excel at vocal reproduction.
The cylindrical SM7B is much more flexible than the 55SH Series II because of the integrated frequency response configurations.
On the other hand, as it is so affectionately known, the Elvis mic is a superior live performance companion for somebody with no funding for a separate studio and gig mics.
Both are dynamic cardioid microphones and lead to a similar noise when bass roll-off or existence increase is chosen on the SM7B.
Neither it demands external phantom power, and off-axis rejection is successful on both, together with it being marginally better compared to the SM7B.
The Elvis mic’s swivel bracket is practical, but I favor the SM7B for everyday use as it is a lot easier to maneuver.
Also, I like the XLR input on the SM7B: it does not interfere with the mic stand adapter, to its placement on the 55SH Series II can pose a problem.
Shure SM7B vs. Shure SM58
Ok, this fast comparison is for kicks as the cost disparity between the two versions makes it unjust to compare them legally. There are particular cases if the lower-tier SM58 is favored within the SM7B, especially for live performances.
If you get most of your shouts from open mics or regular gigs, the Shure SM58 is the better choice. It features durable construction, a replaceable grill, and exceptional vocal reproduction for the purchase price.
You do not need to think about pitching this microphone into your truck or together with the remainder of your gear.
Both are dynamic cardioid microphones so that they could defy loud noises with minimal distortion. The SM58 is a vocal-oriented mix, as exhibited by the heavily overburdened bass response.
Again, this makes sense during live performances; then, you do not wish to reevaluate your drummer or even the arbitrary bumps and knocks which could otherwise prove a distraction from the own performance. For studio mic use, nevertheless, the Shure SM7B wins hands-down.
In our view, the Shure SM7B is such an excellent mic! As we have mentioned, it is incredibly flexible, and we use it for recording vocals mainly, and we are seeking to even do a few movie commentaries with it shortly.
The only disadvantage is the advantage that it takes; a good interface preamp will have the ability to manage it; however, as we proposed, obtaining an inline preamp is a much superior long-term alternative.
None-the-less, there is a reason why the Shure SM7B Cardioid Microphone is a best-seller for Shure, and also it’s gathered numerous fantastic customer testimonials.
We think that the SM7B is Acceptable for almost everybody, given that it is pricing Is Quite cheap (when considering the overall cost of high-quality microphones)
Last update on 2021-05-15 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API