fidlarmusic.com and its partners may earn a commission if you purchase a product through one of our links.

Sennheiser e835 vs Shure SM58 2021: Best Reviews

Sennheiser e835 vs Shure SM58 2021 Best Reviews

Shure SM58 is a legendary mic in audio equipment; it is released at a price of no more than 100 USD and comes with excellent sound, stable operation, and high durability. And of course, it also has many competitors, the most powerful being the Sennheiser e835, a mic designed by Sennheiser with the best and many improved features. If you plan to invest in one of these two mics, follow Fidlar’s Sennheiser e835 vs Shure SM58 comparison article.

Sennheiser e835 Overview

The Sennheiser e835 is a handheld dynamic microphone used mainly for vocals. It is a fantastic performer at an excellent price!

Like many cardioid, dynamic microphone, this one manages to sound friendly and allows for excellent feedback rejection. Its structure is remarkably rugged, meaning that it ought to last you a very long time. Also, it includes a ten-year guarantee, which should provide you confidence in its build quality.

Sennheiser e835 Overview

This mic can also be designed with an innovative internal shock mount to stabilize and protect the capsule from managing noise, which may be an issue at high volumes. It has a uniform frequency pickup pattern that preserves the signal quality when moving on the off-axis during the performance.

It’s a mid-range and luxury increase and a bass roll-off, which can be fantastic for creating vocals that seem more warm and natural also, it does not require much EQ’ing for it to seem significant.

Pros:

  • Sleek, contemporary appearance
  • Constructed for vacationing
  • Cheap
  • Forward, current sound.

Cons:

  • It could be a little sibilant
  • Less hierarchical audio palette than the SM58

Read More: 

Sennheiser E835 Review 2021: Top Full Guide

Shure SM58 Overview

The Shure SM58 is thinking about a staple at the recording business and is, likely, the most well-known mic there’s!

It is designed for professional vocal use in live performance, sound reinforcement, and studio recording.

This Microphone includes an integrated pop-filter that’s rather powerful, not ideal, though.

Shure SM58

It’s a metal mesh grille that guarantees that even with rough handling, the SM58 will perform consistently and may even have the ability to out-live a few of those times it unintentionally drops to the floor.

The same as the Sennheiser e835, the Shure SM58 has an integrated shock bracket to cut back on handling sound, and is constructed like a complete tank, so it is ideal for live performances and take it to the street.

Additionally, it has a mid-boost and bass roll-off but frankly straight from the box, so I favor the e835. Once EQ demanding, they sound fantastic!

Pros:

  • The golden standard in live vocal performance boosters
  • Built like a tank
  • Fantastic accessories
  • Requires well to post-processing such as EQ and compression

Cons:

  • Type of obsolete Look

Read More: 

Shure Sm57 Vs Sm58 2021: Top Full Review, Guide

Shure Sm7B Review 2021: Top Full Guide

Pg58 Vs Sm58 2021: Top Full Review, Guide

What are the Similarities Between the Sennheiser E835 and Shure SM58?

Both the Sennheiser E835 and Shure SM58 have excellent audio quality. However, you would have to EQ the monitor to receive the Shure to seem like the Sennheiser does. As soon as you EQ both monitors, both microphones seem pretty similar and have good quality.

As knives that are dynamic microphones, they need no outside power. They’re also perfect for loud noises, in addition to more durable and flexible. This is obviously in comparison to their arch-nemesis: condenser microphones.

What are the Similarities Between the Sennheiser E835 and Shure SM58

Ultimately, both of these have a cardioid polar pattern. Because of this, they pick up sounds great most OK from the front, a bit on the sides, and nothing from supporting.

It is essential to be aware that closeness is a more critical deal with all the Sennheiser than using all the Shure SM58. It would help if you were as near as possible to the former to find the best audio.

Main Difference Between the Sennheiser e835 vs Shure SM58

E835 vs Shure sm58: Build quality

Sennheiser E835

The Sennheiser E835 may not have the same standing as the Shure SM58 does for durability, but mainly because it has not been around for long.

Despite this, the Sennheiser E835 remains a solidly constructed microphone and will function any road-faring artist well.

It sports a rugged, all-metal body and a rigid metal grille that require a reasonably hard knock to dent, maintaining the microphone capsule inside safe and friendly.

Shure SM58

Shure’s SM58 is pretty much the standard when it comes to mic build quality.

Seriously, you can find videos of folks dropping them from flat buildings and running them in their vehicle, and they still function flawlessly.

Though that is not precisely what you’re likely going to get around, you must understand your 58 will go the distance if you are carrying it on tour, projecting it at the rear of the truck each night with no heavy-duty case.

The 58 is constructed similarly to the E835, together with an all-metal home and metal grille. As a result of the circular form of the 58’s grille, it’s most likely slightly more prone to denting.

The E835 is built like a tank, for sure. However, the Shure SM58 is still an Shure SM58, a rocky mic tried and tested for several years. You can not beat that construct quality.

Read More: 

Shure Se215 Review 2021: Top Full Guide

Sennheiser E935 Review 2021: Top Full Guide

Sennheiser Hd 600 Review 2021: Top Full Guide

E835 vs Shure sm58: Frequency response

Sennheiser E835

The frequency response from this Sennheiser E835 is unquestionably most conspicuous in the upper mids, together with the most significant increase at around 5kHz.

It stays pretty sensitive until about 12kHz, in which the response drops off very steeply, so while it is present and forward, it is not super bright or sparkly.

Sennheiser E835

At the low end of things, the reaction of this Sennheiser E835 slopes down softly by around 600Hz then drops off more steeply after 100Hz or so, which will help to remove any unwanted stage rumble or low-frequency handling sound.

Shure SM58

The frequency response from the Shure SM58 is more or less everything you would expect from a live vocal mic.

It is flat across the reduced, mid-century, using a broad, subtle dip round the 300-600Hz scope to assist the tame company in vocals, and it falls off steeply after 100Hz, as there’s not much energy in that variety from a human voice.

On the other end of the spectrum, the 58 is very well-shaped, with fosters in 3kHz, 6kHz, and 10kHz providing clarity, presence, and atmosphere to some vocal performance,

As you would expect from a handheld dynamic microphone, then it falls off very steeply after 10kHz.

Though a mic’s frequency response is in substantial part an issue of taste and program, the Shure SM58 has a more natural mid-range and not as conspicuous upper-mid promotes, which provide the Microphone a more transparent sound that works well to post-processing like EQ.

E835 vs Shure sm58: Durability

The Shure  SM58 place a standard in the business a mic built for live programs had to have the ability to withstand any potential circumstance it may be thrown in. Let’s break it down wins for durability:

Shure SM58 

The Shure  SM58 requires little to no revealing to demonstrate how durable it is. There’s a slew of evaluations on the internet (some by Shure themselves) to reveal precisely how much this mic can deal with. When it’s beer spilled on it through a gig, or even the mic being chucked across the ground, the Shure SM58 can manage it. Shure trusted that they ran it on with a tour bus (it worked, incidentally ).

The Shure SM58 is created to last a lifetime, and most will wind up maintaining theirs for this long. Concerning durability, it isn’t easy to overcome an SM58.

Sennheiser e835 Durability

Sennheiser e835

Though the Sennheiser e835 does not hold the heritage the Shure SM58 retains, it does not signify any less lasting. Sennheiser hasn’t performed the crazy stunts Shure has, yet this mic can live together with the Shure SM58 concerning durability.

The Sennheiser mirrors the Shure having an all-metal body and windscreen, and feels equally as lasting in the palms.

If you are only casually using the mic in the studio, the Sennheiser e835 will hold up just in addition to the SM58; however, if you consider venturing further beyond that, the Shure SM58 still wins out. Therefore, the Shure SM58 is a superb stage mic.

Regardless, the two microphones will endure for 99 percent of everything you may throw at them. Also, an attractive 10-year mill warranty on the Sennheiser provides a tiny bit of relaxation in the event the mic somehow does wind up beneath the wheel of a tour bus. While technically, the Shure SM58 wins within this class, I will call it a draw because both microphones hold up also.

E835 vs Shure sm58: Versatility

Among the chief reasons all-purpose $99 dynamic microphones are so appealing is because it’s simply that – all-purpose. While primarily used on vocals in a live program, both microphones need to be in a position to be thrown any origin and get excellent audio quality. Let us see that it satisfies this challenge:

Shure Sm58

The Shure SM58 is, again, iconic for sounding fantastic on an assortment of sources. Even though there’s a bulge in the upper end of the mic (high frequency), the remaining part of the frequency response is relatively flat, with a steep roll-off starting at approximately 100 Hz.

The Shure SM58 may be used on virtually anything for the horizontal reply and get a pretty good sound from it. But, I’d to shy away from using it on whatever requires advice below 100Hz since the Shure SM58 does not appear to deal with this area very well.

While the advertising material implies that the frequency response extends all of the ways down to 50Hz, the real story is the mic can hardly maintain at 75-80Hz.

Sennheiser e835

The Sennheiser e835 tells a similar story to the SM58. You will find a presence increase, a level frequency at the mid-century, and a roll-off from the lows. On the other hand, the Sennheiser e835 requires this traditional reply and pushes it further.

First off, the existence increase is somewhat more exaggerated and extends farther than the SM58. This is extremely valuable on resources such as the human voice but may be troublesome on devices including hi-gain guitars.

On the other hand, the most intriguing shift in the Sennheiser e835 is that the elongated low-end. As you won’t hear considerably below 50Hz on both microphones, the Sennheiser e835 has a far slower roll-off, keeping lots of those low-end frequencies. It may be used on resources such as a bassy voice, a bass guitar amp, or perhaps a kick drum and fair decently well.

Once more, the two microphones can perform exceedingly well under any circumstance given that the price point. Each mic has its solid suits for various resources, and if you are lucky enough to have both, it is possible to experiment and discover what you like.

Even though this might easily be referred to as a draw again, I will provide the win to the Sennheiser e835. For my money, an elongated low-end answer is valuable in an all-purpose mike, and I believe that the existence hurtle is a lot easier to work around than attempting to return low-end that is not there on the SM58.

E835 vs Shure sm58: Audio Quality

Each the specs and each the testing compared does not matter whether the mic does not seem any good. After the day, these microphones need to be durable and flexible, but they must appear great to start with. Let us see which mic sounds great:

The Shure SM58 isn’t the best-sounding mic on the market, by any stretch of the imagination. While it will have a presence bulge along with a steep roll-off, the mic often comes off a little flat sounding. That is not to say the mic sounds muted, since it indeed doesn’t, but it only appears to be a clean slate with sharp texture.

Because of this, the Shure SM58 can seem more or less any way you want it to appear. The rationale the Shure SM58 is popular out of durability and flexibility is because it requires EQ also. The mic can be shaped however you see fit and frequently comes out with a fantastic sound.

From the box, you could be underwhelmed with the SM58. However, all of the info is there that you flip it in the handheld microphone that you would like to hear.

From the box, the Sennheiser e835 is a great deal more pleasing than the SM58. Attributed to the existence increase, the mic sounds more spacious and airy, like an inventory EQ put in a Shure SM58 typically. The lows seem fuller and more defined on the opposing side, which makes the mic’s overall sound more gratifying when the first setup.

But this usually means that the mic has much less space for EQ before meddling into the scarce land. The Sennheiser e835 can’t be pushed with EQ, such as the Shure SM58 can, and it looks more of a completed product and not as much of a canvas.

This is extremely useful for specific programs, and the Sennheiser e835 will triumph over a Shure SM58 each moment. Considering that the mic can’t be shaped like the SM58, it may often come off a bit too harsh on several resources because the existence increase is more significant.

In my experience, if the highs are fostered anymore within a Sennheiser e835e835 at a live atmosphere, then the mic starts feeding back like mad, a problem that has to be avoided in any way costs.

It is pretty tricky to predict a winner in a class where the source indeed determines the audio. The Sennheiser e835e835 does seem much gratifying. However, the Shure SM58 seems better if calibrated correctly.

For the EQ skills using the SM58, which are much less extensive than people on the e835, I will need to provide the win to the Shure SM58 as it can be molded more to seem better on any origin. Keep in mind that if you need the mic for a single goal, and one goal alone, then the Sennheiser e835e835 could be the better choice.

Sennheiser e835 vs SM58: Polar pattern

Sennheiser E835

The Sennheiser E835 has a cardioid polar pattern, which makes it picks up noise from the front, a little in the sides, and rejects it in the back.

Sennheiser e835 Polar pattern

 Shure SM58

The Shure SM58 also utilizes a cardioid polar pattern, which can be pretty much exactly what you would like using a live vocal mic since you frequently point the back of the microphone down in the point screens.

This rear-rejection lowers the odds of comments between the screen along with your mic.

It is a tie; they’re equally cardioid microphones using a tight pickup pattern and exceptional off-axis rejection.

Sennheiser e835 vs SM58: Accessories

Sennheiser E835

A no-fuss is, with criteria, sending using a standard mic clip and a small carrying bag.

Shure SM58

Shure ships their 58 with similar accessories, although the microphone clip feels just a little sleeker, along with the tote, has a beautiful leather texture and look to it. They also incorporate a mic stand thread adaptor and convenient small Velcro cable tie that I have found unlimited use for if coiling cables up following a gig.

This is a no-brainer: the Shure SM58 ships using a much better bag and microphone clip, as well as contains a Velcro cable tie.

Shure SM58 vs sennheiser e835: Price & Value For Money

Sennheiser E835

The Sennheiser E835 slides in only below the $100 mark, which can be pretty affordable as much as knives go.

The only other thing that you can ask for is to get an XLR mic cable to be contained, but considering this is not standard with pro-level equipment, it is forgivable.

A Velcro cable tie would not hurt, however.

Shure SM58

The Shure SM58 also prices $99. Therefore both of these units are directly related concerning cost.

The 58 includes a few more accessories and will be more elastic when contemplating noise and frequency response.

Thus, the Shure SM58 does provide better value for money but.

Sennheiser E835 vs Shure SM58: Circumstances They’re Best Suited for

Since these microphones are similar, Sennheiser e835 vs SM 58 could do the job in addition to the other for the majority of these situations.

Sennheiser E835

They are fantastic for talking. If you operate a podcast, then leave poetry, conduct interviews, give lectures, or any affair which needs talking, both of these microphones work nicely for this.

That is because they are both obvious and possess good mid-tones.

For singing, experience has demonstrated this microphone is a bit better, particularly for live performances.

The matter is that this mic has a broader frequency response out of the box compared to the Shure SM58. This implies it would have the ability to catch a more comprehensive dynamic range concerning a singer’s voice.

Additionally, to receive the Shure SM58 to seem as great as this, it takes some equalization. This is something that you might be unable to perform if you are singing live.

Shure SM58

This mic is excellent for producing instruments since both of them are dynamic microphones. They function best with loud noises, like drum snares or even a blaring horn.

Nonetheless, this is a bit better due to its reduced output impedance. You may use this to mic an acoustic guitar throughout the room without worrying about dropping the high-ends.

The cardioid polar pattern which both of these microphones include makes them excellent for use with numerous individuals.

If you’ve got a choir, you’ll have one person hold the gear while two others inhale out of the sides. Due to the polar pattern, the mic would have the ability to pick up all three voices.

This mic does better with accepting noises out of the side compared to the Sennheiser.

Sennheiser e835 vs Shure SM58: Conclusion

From the last article, it was clear that Sennheiser e835 vs SM58 mics are great, but if we had to choose, we would probably choose the Shure SM58; they offer high-end accessories, better adjustable sound, and quality. The incredible build volume can’t be beaten. Although Shure SM58 is the winner, Sennheiser E835 is still a great mic and deserves to be experienced.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *